Skip to main content
Log in

Seeing what we know and understand: How knowledge shapes perception

  • Brief Reports
  • Published:
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Expertise in object recognition, as in bird watching or X-ray specialization, is based on extensive perceptual experience and in-depth semantic knowledge. Although it has been shown that rich perceptual experience shapes elementary perception and higher level discrimination and identification, little is known about the influence of in-depth semantic knowledge on object perception and identification. By means of recording event-related brain potentials (ERPs), we show that the amount of knowledge acquired about initially unfamiliar objects modulates visual ERP components already 120 msec after object presentation, and causes gradual variations of activity in similar brain systems within a later timeframe commonly associated with meaning access. When perceptual analysis is made more difficult by blurring object pictures, knowledge has an even stronger effect on perceptual analysis and facilitates recognition. These findings demonstrate that in-depth knowledge not only affects involuntary semantic memory access, but also shapes perception by penetrating early visual processes traditionally held to be immune to such influences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bar, M., Kassam, K. S., Ghuman, A. S., Boshyan, J., Schmid, A. M., Dale, A. M., et al. (2006). Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 449–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W., Simmons, W. K., Barbey, A. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 84–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, P., & Scherg, M. (1991). Dipole modelling of eye activity and its application to the removal of eye artefacts from the EEG and MEG. Clinical Physiology & Physiological Measurements, 12, 49–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Russo, F., Martínez, A., Sereno, M. I., Pitzalis, S., & Hillyard, S. A. (2001). Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Human Brain Mapping, 15, 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, I., James, T. W., Curby, K. M., & Tarr, M. J. (2003). The influence of conceptual knowledge on visual discrimination. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 507–523.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, I., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., & Anderson, A. W. (2000). Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 191–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Anderson, A. W., Skudlarski, P., & Gore, J. C. (1999). Activation of the middle fusiform “face area” increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 568–573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, I., Williams, P., Tarr, M. J., & Tanaka, J. W. (1998). Training “greeble” experts: A framework for studying expert object recognition processes. Vision Research, 38, 2401–2428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, R. F., Perfetti, C. A., & Schneider, W. (2006). Perceptual knowledge retrieval activates sensory brain regions. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 4917–4921.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grill-Spector, K., & Kanwisher, N. (2005). Visual recognition: As soon as you know it is there, you know what it is. Psychological Science, 16, 152–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hillyard, S. A., & Anllo-Vento, L. (1998). Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 781–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopfinger, J. B., Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (2004). Selective attention: Electrophysiological and neuromagnetic studies. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (3rd ed., pp. 561–574). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, T. W., & Gauthier, I. (2003). Auditory and action semantic features activate sensory-specific perceptual brain regions. Current Biology, 13, 1792–1796.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • James, T. W., & Gauthier, I. (2004). Brain areas engaged during visual judgments by involuntary access to novel semantic information. Vision Research, 44, 429–439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, M., Sim, E.-J., Liebich, S., Hauk, O., & Tanaka, J. (2007). Experience-dependent plasticity of conceptual representations in human sensory-motor areas. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 525–542.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas, M., Van Petten, C. K., & Kluender, R. (2006). Psycholinguistics electrified II: 1994–2005. In M. A. Gernsbacher & M. Traxler (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 659–724). New York: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, D., & Skrandies, W. (1980). Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 48, 609–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. (1998). The organization of semantic knowledge and the origin of words in the brain. In N. Jablonski & L. Aiello (Eds.), The origin and diversification of language (pp. 69–98). San Francisco: California Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. (2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 25–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meeren, H. K. M., van Heijnsbergen, C. C. R. J., & de Gelder, B. (2005). Rapid perceptual integration of facial expression and emotional body language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 16518–16523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pexman, P. M., Hargreaves, I. S., Edwards, J. D., Henry, L. C., & Goodyear, B. G. (2007). The neural consequences of semantic richness: When more comes to mind, less activation is observed. Psychological Science, 18, 401–406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Talairach, J., & Tournoux, P. (1988). Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. New York: Thieme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, J. W., & Curran, T. A. (2001). A neural basis for expert object recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 43–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, J. W., Curran, T. A., & Sheinberg, D. L. (2005). The training and transfer of real-world perceptual expertise. Psychological Science, 16, 145–151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381, 520–522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • von Müller, F. T. A. H. (1982). Unterhaltungen mit Goethe [Conversations with Goethe]. Munich: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, J., van Turennout, M., & Martin, A. (2007). A neural system for learning about object function. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 513–521.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rasha Abdel Rahman.

Additional information

This work was supportecd by German Research Foundation Grant AB277 to R.A.R.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abdel Rahman, R., Sommer, W. Seeing what we know and understand: How knowledge shapes perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15, 1055–1063 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.6.1055

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.6.1055

Keywords

Navigation